By Christie Malchow
Mayor, City of Sammamish
We often hear this term, 𝐠𝐫𝐨𝐰𝐭𝐡 𝐩𝐚𝐲𝐬 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐠𝐫𝐨𝐰𝐭𝐡. But does it?
It doesn’t in the absolute sense. Actually, state law prevents it from paying its full impact, leaving the balance of the burden to existing taxpayers to fill the void.
In a 4/3 split vote, Sammamish City Council voted to officially oppose Sen. Palumbo’s bill to mandate upzoning in areas within the Urban Growth Boundary (UGB).
Council member Chris Ross said:
“I am very strongly against ceding control over our community… to allow the state to take over our planning and treating an urban rural suburb [Sammamish] the same as core urban city like Seattle is completely irresponsible”.
Speaker after speaker Tuesday asked the Sammamish City Council to reject a suggestion that a building moratorium be imposed.
Each one had a personal financial stake of some kind, or represented someone who did, or simply philosophical opposition to the idea.
Only about three people favored the moratorium.
But only one of all those who spoke stood up and presented a fact-based argument backed by details and citing legal questions.
Jennifer Kim, founder of the group Save Sammamish, zeroed in on the state requirements for housing under the Growth Management Act. (The GMA also sets job targets, although this was not part of Kim’s presentation.)
Kim also cited the City’s Comprehensive Plan and the growth targets it contains.