In a historic vote, Sammamish City Council takes a stand on over-development

By Miki Mullor

Analysis

On Tuesday night, the Sammamish City Council drew a line in the sand on over-development, forcing a potential pause on development until a much needed public infrastructure is built.  

A split council voted on an esoteric traffic engineering parameter that decides what is the accepted level of traffic congestion the city is willing to tolerate.  

In doing so, the council have possibly made Sammamish the first jurisdiction in the Puget Sound to be implementing the Growth Management Act (GMA) the way it was originally intended to – to protect the citizens’ quality of life.

Traffic raised concerns

When signs of over development started hitting Sammamish a few years ago, residents started voicing concerns over traffic congestion, schools overcrowding and damage to the environment.  

Worried about being perceived as being pro-developer, the former administration tried to hide behind a misrepresentation of Growth Management Act (GMA).

Lyman Howard

In the city’s monthly newsletter, then-City Manager Lyman Howard said that, “By law, developers have the right to buy land and build new homes. Cities can manage and regulate development, but they can’t stop it.”  

The article continues to say that “The state’s Growth Management Act (GMA) requires cities to accept new growth.”

As it was later revealed, Howard’s explanation of the law not only was not written by a lawyer, or reviewed by a lawyer, nor was it even written by Howard – it was written by then-Communications Manager Tim Larson – and it was an utter misrepresentation of the law.  

The GMA actually prohibits development if there is not adequate public infrastructure (roads mainly) to serve the new development – a requirement called “concurrency”.

It’s up to city council to decide how traffic is measured and at what level of congestion the roads are considered inadequate.  

Manipulation revealed

In June 2017, this author revealed evidence that the administration manipulated concurrency to “always pass,” enabling over-development in Sammamish.  

Independently, then-Council Member Tom Odell and currently serving Mayor Christie Malchow and Council Member Tom Hornish also suspected the concurrency system was flawed but were stonewalled by city staff.

Howard initially refuted the charge in public. Larson even attempted a “hit job” on this author and his editor by pushing a false narrative to the Issaquah/Sammamish Reporter. The attempt was blocked by the newspaper editor and the reporter was assigned to a different region.  

Later that year, Larson was put on an administrative leave and eventually resigned.

Building moratorium enacted

The city council responded by enacting a building moratorium and ordered staff to fix the concurrency system so it reflects the drivers’ experience.  It looked initially as if staff is listening to city council. The city tasked Fehr & Peers, a local consulting firm, with running the project.

The elephant in the room was the Town Center project, a massive 2,300 housing units and up to 600,000 square feet of commercial space project planned in the middle town. Major portions were about to enter the permitting phase.  

But given the poor state of infrastructure in Sammamish, an honest concurrency system would likely cause a delay for years to any development project in the city, including the Town Center – until the infrastructure can be brought up to standards.

Promises made, promises not kept

The council spent the first half of 2018 listening to staff and consultants promising improvements to the concurrency system, so it will account for the congestion on the roads.   

Then, in May, six months into the project, we reported that a shocked city council heard staff admitting the new system also ignores congestion, just like the old one.

Suspicion of intent by city staff to “run the clock” ran high among some members of city council.  Our revelation of secret meetings and conflict of interest involving Fehr & Peers, the traffic consultant, didn’t help either.  

Pressure to move on

Pressure was high from Town Center property owners, STCA (the Town Center developer), the Master Builders Assn. (the developers’ lobbyist) and three pro-Town Center council members to “move on” and accept a what looked like a worse concurrency system than the one that pushed Sammamish into a severe state of over-development to begin with.

Four council members were trying to hold the line against the tremendous pressure and an emboldened city staff.

Something had to give.

Volume to Capacity

Karen Moran

Deputy Mayor Karen Moran has been around the block.  A newly elected council member in 2017, Moran has been involved in the city business since incorporation as a member of the Planning Advisory Board, a Planning Commissioner and as Sammamish Plateau Water District commissioner.  

Moran needed something that staff couldn’t push back on and couldn’t easily manipulate.  

Realizing the difficult political position staff put the council in, Moran suggested adding back a traffic measurement known as “volume capacity ratio” (“V/C”). V/C has been used in the past but it was manipulated to use bogus formulas that give roads capacity for features like sidewalks, bike lanes and wider lanes.  

V/C is a widely used index, well established in traffic engineering and was used in Sammamish for 15 years, so the data was readily available.  But most importantly, it’s simple: it compares the number of cars passing on a roadway to a predetermined capacity number. By itself, it cannot be fudged.

In June, city council ordered staff to add V/C back to concurrency.  The battle will now wage on the implementation: what the formulas will look like and what ratio numbers to plug in.

Fighting city hall

But as well known to anyone who knows the inner working of local politics, it’s very hard to fight city hall. Staff has control over data and processes, controls how budgets are spent on consultants and is considered experts in their field.  It’s very hard for a volunteer city council members to handle agenda-biased staff.

As early as May, signs emerged that Howard was on his way out.  In June, his long time deputy Jessi Bon resigned and took a step down position in Mercer Island.  In July, we reported on Howard’s separation from the city.

With Howard and Bon out of the way, the tone and interaction between city council and staff has changed. Awkward discussions and stonewalling were replaced with positive and honest discussion in and out of council meetings.

Progress was being made on the new V/C concurrency.

Pivotal vote 

Then, on Tuesday night, it all came to one decision: what V/C ratio should roads in Sammamish tolerate before deemed inadequate.

The Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) defines V/C ratio of over 1.0 as “flow at extremely low speed. Congestion is li likely occurring… as indicated by high delay and extensive queuing”

Council Members Ramiro Valderrama, Pam Stuart and Jason Ritchie – the Town Center cheerleaders – pushed for a high V/C, knowing it will allow continuing of development, especially the Town Center.

Their motion failed.

Council Member Tom Hornish

Hornish moved to adopt a V/C of 1.1, which immediately recognizes several major arterials as inadequate and thus conditioning any new development on improvement to the infrastructure.

V/C 1.1 is the ratio that was used by King County for this area before Sammamish was incorporated.

His motion passed with support from Moran, Malchow and Chris Ross.  

Valderrama, Stuart and Ritchie voted against.

A decimal point in an esoteric traffic engineering parameter may have made all the difference in what Sammamish will look like in five years.

With the roads officially now declared inadequate, new development will be prohibited unless the city can show assured funding to improve the roads within six years. 

GMA’s failure in the spotlight 

It may have also made Sammamish the focal point of a long time observed flaw in the GMA: relying on local governments to manage growth and build infrastructure.

The local governments are in conflict of interest with the GMA: they want the revenues associated with development and therefore cannot be trusted to be ones regulating.  The courts assume local elected officials will do what’s best for their constituents.

However, the history in Sammamish proved otherwise.

The result is inadequate infrastructure throughout the Puget Sound region.

Sammamish, with its challenging topography, no access to highways or to mass transit became the poster child of the GMA failure.

Get real time updates to your email when news are posted. Your email will not be shared with third parties

Join 849 other followers

4 thoughts on “In a historic vote, Sammamish City Council takes a stand on over-development”

  1. This is tremendous news. Thank you so much for all your diligent work on revealing the traffic mess and how the city has been dealing or not dealing with it.

  2. Alternative Analysis:

    ATTAINING VAST, ENDURING BENEFITS FOR OUR
    COMMUNITY BY SUSTAINABLY OPTIMIZING
    HOUSING SUPPLIES WITHIN SAMMAMISH.

    Housing supplies continue to be far out of balance with
    housing ‘Needs’ and ‘Wants’ — as planned and unplanned
    changes occur over recurring cycles-of-life — for those living
    and/or working in Sammamish.

    Recently the Sammamish Comment suggested an
    intervention with the City Council is needed. I agree.

    What should the intervention be?

    Changing land-use policies and numbers in the Comprehensive Plan
    to attain modest, optimal Housing Balance within Sammamish.

    Fundamentally, doing this will …
    > Lessen housing types we have oversupplies/surpluses of.
    > Increase housing types we have undersupplies/shortage of.
    > Right-size economics and affluence based on optimized housing.

    Community Benefits

    Why do this — how does optimizing housing in the Comp Plan benefit
    the community? Here are several principle advantages:

    • Thousands of households can stay in Sammamish as their lives change.
    • Tens of Thousands fewer car-trips below current planning & zoning.
    • Hundreds of Millions dollars in revenue to our city, short and long term,
    and several Billions of dollars saved by our residents.
    • Hundreds of Thousands of hours saved for our residents.
    • Millions fewer square feet of impervious surface citywide.
    • Hundreds of acres preserved for open space, wildlife & trees.
    • Critical mass for suitable and effective transit – internal and regional.
    • Enduring improvement to our coveted Community Character & Identity.

    Disclosures and Statements. I Have ….

    • Had an interest in a five acre parcel in what is now the
    Town Center since 1997 with Richard Birgh, who has lived
    in Sammamish since 1968.

    • Been an active residential real estate agent over 40 years.
    Moved to the Eastside from Montana in 1990.

    • Expert knowledge of housing in eastside communities, having
    seen over 70,000 homes.

    • Been involved in Sammamish since its incorporation
    in 1999 and have lived here since 2013.

    • Attended over 95% of City Council Meetings and
    Planning Commission meetings for the last five years.

    • Used the term “we” and/or “our” quite a bit. This refers
    to the entire community, unless I say otherwise.

    • Written three OpEd articles about Housing Balance and co-authored
    several compilations pertaining to Internal Housing Balance.

    Concurrency and Overdevelopment?

    Today – there’s much ado about traffic concurrency and
    alleged overdevelopment of housing.

    From the standpoint of traffic congestion caused by
    choke points outside the city during rush hours … and
    slowdowns by schools at drop-off/pick-up times there
    may be housing overdevelopment in Sammamish.

    From the standpoint of zoned capacity at time of incorporation
    there is significant housing underdevelopment in Sammamish.

    From the standpoint of housing supplies balanced to recurring
    internal Housing ‘Needs’ and ‘Wants’ over time there is:
    -Overdevelopment of large single-family homes.
    -Underdevelopment of all other housing types.

    Symptom focus, rather than Ailment focus.

    Concurrency has been the rage the last year and a half.
    However it is only a symptom. The underlying ailments are
    unbalanced housing supplies and lack of capital spending
    on identified deficient road projects.

    It is short sighted and inappropriate to focus on the symptom.
    Where we need to go as a community is to face, head on, the
    elephant in the room – changing land-uses in the Comp Plan.

    The solution to traffic issues is to cure their root ailments.

    Here’s how:

    A. Change housing land-use policies and numbers in the comp plan
    to attain modest and sustainable, optimal housing balance. Then,
    right-size economics based on the Housing Balance choices made.

    B. Allow time for these land-use changes; critical mass for effective
    transit and walkability to do their magic — and make Sammamish the
    best it can be in significant, holistic and long-lasting ways.

    C. Then if/as/when needed, spend money on major capital road projects.

    Time and the GMA.

    This is not about just the here and now, it’s much more than that.
    It is about the past, where we are today and the future. Not just
    the 20-year planning horizon of the Comprehensive Plan but 80
    year recurring cycles-of-life for all residents of the city.

    The GMA has not failed in Sammamish. The truth is we have failed
    ourselves. We have neither planned to optimize our housing supplies to
    meet Housing ‘Needs’ and ‘Wants’ in sustainable ways— nor have we
    remedied the vast majority of identified deficient capital road projects.

    Recommendations to the City Council:

    1) Apply strict V/C to additional large single-family home oversupplies.

    2) Appropriately flexible V/C for smaller, different and diverse housing
    options as our community has big internal housing shortages.

    3) Resolve to change housing land-use policies and numbers in the
    Comp Plan from “Minimize & Mitigate” to “Optimize & Mitigate” at
    light speed. Then apply optimized land-use changes made to all plans
    and programs in Sammamish that have their basis in land-use.

    Conclusions:

    Changing our Comprehensive Plan to Optimize housing land-use policies
    and numbers will improve the quality of life for those living and/or working
    in Sammamish over recurring cycles-of-life.

    Housing Balance is about making Livability, Lifestyles & Experiences
    the best they can be – in holistic, sustainable and enduring ways.

    Paul Stickney. 425-417-4556.

    Note: I will be writing two other Opinion to the Editor articles (OpEd’s).
    One will have much more detail and background information about the
    numbers associated with optimized land-use through ‘Common Cause
    Housing Balance’. The other will dive into the realities of past traffic
    impact fees, identified road deficiencies and discussion of how these factors
    have impacted where we are today … and how they pertain to our future.

  3. It is high time the council is getting their act together. Just look at Redmond allowing the construction of apartments on every corner. This will choke the traffic in every direction. Money is king to collect tax dollars. Any clue, what will happen if a major catastrophe will hit the region? No services of any kind and hell will strike next. The city council must not have any logic. Sincerely, H.W. Maine

    Sent from Mail for Windows 10

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s