Start voting from the bottom up

Sammamish residents should have received their mail-in ballots for the Nov. 8 election by now.

Given the top of the ballot, the presidential race, offers such an awful set of choices, voters might instead start at the bottom of the ballot and work their way to the top.

The Seattle Times lists its endorsements for initiatives, propositions and the elective races here. You have to go to this link and then select the ones you’re interested in reading. Sammamish Comment concluded its endorsements yesterday.

Continue reading

Sammamish adopts Initiative Resolution on 5-2 vote

The Sammamish City Council tonight (July 7) adopted a resolution declaring its intent to adopt an ordinance granting residents the right to Initiative and Referendum.

Due to legal requirements in State law, a separate vote will be forthcoming to adopt the enabling ordinance. The effective date is estimate to be on or about October 10.

Deputy Mayor Kathy Huckabay and Council Member Tom Odell voted against the resolution. The rest of the seven member council voted for it.

Odell was the lone vote against even sending the issue to voters for an Advisory Ballot. Voters said Yes in an April 28 vote by a 55%-45% margin.

Huckabay, who led a stealth campaign against the April 28 vote, stood by her long-held opposition to the I&R. She professed neutrality while leading the stealth campaign.

I’m one of the 47%–but I pay taxes at a higher rate than Mitt Romney

Update, Sept. 24: This article analyses Romney’s 2011 tax return and concludes that but for the sleight-of-hand, his tax rate would have been between 12% and 10%.

Original Post:

By now, most are probably well aware of Mitt Romney’s astounding statement about the 47% of the voters who support Barack Obama for reelection.

Here’s his quote:

“There are 47 percent of the people who will vote for the president no matter what.All right — there are 47 percent who are with him, who are dependent on government, who believe that, that they are victims, who believe that government has the responsibility to care for them. Who believe that they are entitled to health care, to food, to housing.”

Having long ago concluded that Romney is a duplicitous, say-anything-to-win politician (hardly unique, by the way) who doesn’t appear to have any core values except to shifting positions in order to win, yes, I will be voting for Obama, no matter what.

I have news for the governor: My wife and I:

  • Are not dependent upon the government. I have my own business.
  • Don’t believe we are victims.
  • Don’t believe the government has a responsibility to care for us–yet. But when it comes time to collect Social Security, Medicare and maybe Medicaid–for which we’ve paid taxes our whole working lives–you bet, we expect to be able to tap these funds.
  • We’re fortunate that we have our own house and can buy our own food.
  • We’ve been paying for our own health care, an individual policy that has gone up generally 20%-30% per year (expletive to you, Regence Blue Shield) when the CPI index has consistently been below 5%.
  • And, oh, by the way governor: We also pay taxes, at a tax rate higher than you paid in 2010. I bet our tax rate would be higher for the last 10 years–if you’d release your tax returns.

My 92-year old mother doesn’t pay income taxes, but according to you she is a freeloading moocher. Until March, she still lived in and paid for her own apartment. She now lives in a 24-hour healthcare facility, paying for her own room and board from her life-long savings and her  Social Security earned from a lifetime of working. When the savings is gone, Medicaid will kick in–provided you aren’t elected and gut this program. She paid taxes that went toward Medicaid. Soon it will be time to benefit from it.

My 86-year old mother-in-law also doesn’t pay income taxes, so according to you she, too, is a freeloader. She has her own home, living off Social Security and her savings. Both use Medicare. Both have supplemental health insurance. Both get supplemental financial support from their children. But according to you, governor, they are dregs of society.

There was one Tweet that neatly sums you up, governor: You just tied 47% of us to the roof of your car.

Vote No on 1125

Initiative 1125 is masquerading as a tolling bill.  In reality, it would devastate funding for our major roads projects such as SR 520, the viaduct, the Columbia River Crossing and SR 167.  The Office of Financial Management estimates that the state would lose over $60m in federal matching monies if this initiative passes.

Twenty-five percent of the funding for 520 comes from tolls.  Because the Initiative provides that the politicians in Olympia will set the tolls rather than an independent commission of traffic experts, our State Treasurer’s independent analysis shows that the cost of interest on the bonds might increase by $18m per $100m of principal if they could be sold at all.  How many investors do you know would buy bonds whose payback is dependent on decisions by politicians?

Further, after the initial bonds are paid, the tolls would come off and we would be back competing for gas tax funds with other projects around the state.  Gas tax funds are currently stretched to the limit and many rural roads will turn into gravel roads due to the lack of funds.  Removal of the tolls will only accelerate the deterioration.

Secondly, there is a little clause slipped into the end of the initiative that would bar Sound Transit from putting light rail on the I-90.  Voters and the communities around I-90 support light rail but one Bellevue wealthy developer is opposed to this project.  He is the primary funder of this initiative.

There is an incredibly broad coalition supporting No On 1125.  Businesses, chambers of commerce across the state, newspapers, environmental, non-profit and neighborhood groups have come together to say No to 1125, including one of Bellevue’s key business groups.

A “No” vote on 1125 is the preferred vote.