Final City Council results

Well, almost. They won’t be completely counted until the end of today but this is, for all practical purposes, “it.” The City had a 52% turn-out, better than some other cities and worse than others. This is about normal for an off-year election for Sammamish.

One interesting note: the drop off from the top of the ballot (Whitten-Richardson) to the bottom (Vance-Bornfreund) was 6%. This is an unusually high number. Typically this ranges around 2%. The drop off is indicative of voters not wanting to vote for either candidate.

In the Valderrama-Wasnick race, the results were nearly in line with my prediction: that the 24% primary vote gained by John Galvin would pretty much evenly split between Valderrama (46%) and Wasnick (26%). It wasn’t quite 50-50 but it was very close. As I told a couple of interested parties, the math simply didn’t work for Wasnick. He had to win 24% plus one vote to win while Valderrama only had to gain 4% plus one. The strategy by some Wasnick supporters that 100% of Galvin’s vote would shift to Wasnick simply was fantasy land.

The final results were also very close to those on Election Night, as I also projected.

CITY OF SAMMAMISH
Ballots Cast/Registered Voters: * 14068 / 27117 51.88%
Council Position No. 2
Nancy Whitten 6485 53.84%
Kathy Richardson 5529 45.90%
Write-in 31 0.26%
Council Position No. 4
Ramiro Valderrama 6646 56.56%
Jim Wasnick 5076 43.20%
Write-in 29 0.25%
Council Position No. 6
Jesse Bornfreund 3622 31.91%
Tom Vance 7681 67.67%
Write-in 48 0.42%

Poor economy slows Issaquah Highlands, Lincoln Square projects

The poor economy is making it difficult for Issaquah Highlands to attract retailers, and it also prompted Bellevue developer Kemper Freeman to delay expansion of Lincoln Square.

The Issaquah Press last week had this article explaining the problems the developer of the Highlands is having attracting retailers. The developer is asking the city to pony up $3m to help fund changes to the infrastructure to ease the cost of development.

The article explains:

In order to complete a long-planned business district in the Issaquah Highlands — and transform 14 acres into a cinema, shops, restaurants and more than 1,700 parking stalls — the developer behind the project said about $3 million in city funds is needed.

The developer, Florida-based Regency Centers, said the highlands project needs the dollars to complete roadwork and other infrastructure.

Regency and highlands developer Port Blakely Communities announced a deal in July to sell the land for a retail center, but before Regency completes the deal, company planners asked city leaders to commit public dollars to the project.

Regency is the prime landlord of the commercial centers in Sammamish.

Regency told the city, according to the newspaper:

Meanwhile, interest is low from prospective tenants for the proposed retail complex, as retailers remain reluctant to expand amid a difficult economy.

“We don’t have tenants for all of this space right now. We have some,” [Regency] said. “We have some demand, but it’s a challenge. It’s a very, very tough economic environment right now.”

Over in Bellevue, Freeman acquired the property immediately south of Lincoln Square that previously housed a supermarket. This was closed, with the intent to raze the buildings and expand the square. But because of the poor economy, these plans were put on hold and the supermarket was recently leased to another grocer.

These actions are significant for Sammamish. Our Town Center has been stalled since adoption of the enabling ordinances in January as the economy floundered and banks continue to withhold lending into new projects. Despite claims during the election that the Town Center plan is unworkable, the reality is other factors are driving the non-action.

Our city council’s economic develop committee is trying to figure ways to kick-start the Town Center. The council is considering setting aside $3m (which happens to be the same amount being asked of Issaquah by Regency) to apply toward infrastructure.

Considering the dwindling cash reserves of Sammamish, this proposal is going to come under scrutiny next year.

It’s all over; losers concede to winners

It’s done: the concessions have been given. Tom Vance, Ramiro Valderrama and Nancy Whitten are the winners (though there has been no doubt since Election Night). The Sammamish Patch has now weighed in and declared them winners.

So how does the voting bloc line up on the Council now?

Left-leaning

Nancy Whitten

Tom Vance

Right Leaning

John Curley

John James

Center-Left

Tom Odell

Ramiro Valderrama

Center-Right

Don Gerend

As with any label, however, it’s pretty tough to accurately portray someone. For example, none of the council members can be described as entirely property rights or environmentalists. Gerend is the most pro-development Council Member but he also has an environmental streak.

Curley, a Libertarian at heart, wants to increase tree retention requirements.

Whitten, perceived as the staunchest environmentalist on the Council before this election, has a contrarian property rights streak in her.

James, a solid Republican, surprised me with his pragmatic view from his real estate profession that the pave-it-over plans for the Town Center espoused by Gerend and others are feasible. In other words, he is no knee-jerk pro-development Council Member that many expected when he was elected.

Vance and Whitten will form the left wing of the Council.

Valderrama, whose base of support is the lakefront–a conservative wing–also drew solid support from environmentalists–the conservationists wing. He and Odell are fiscal conservatives but favor environmental issues.

In fact, the entire Council, except for Gerend, favor fiscal conservatism. (Gerend still favors doubling the real estate excise tax, or REET).

With that, we are done with our election coverage.

Watch this space periodically for updates on other issues affecting Sammamish.

Day 3 of Election Results

Nancy Whitten gained ground as measured by percentages, but only fractionally. Ramiro Valderrama and Tom Vance gained ground, also fractionally.

Yesterday (Wednesday) the Sammamish Review, the Seattle Times and the TV stations declared Whitten and Valderrama winners. Vance made the cut on Tuesday night with TV and the Seattle Times but not until Wednesday afternoon for the Sammamish Review.

Of course, you read it here first. We declared all three winners Tuesday night.

Thur, Nov 10 Votes %
Position 2
Nancy Whitten       4,474 53.36%
Kathy Richarson       3,889 46.39%
Position 4
Ramiro Valderrama       4,667 56.88%
Jim Wasnick       3,519 46.39%
Position 6
Jesse Bornfreund       2,494 31.44%
Tom Vance       5,405 68.15%
Wed, Nov 9, 2011 Votes %
Position 2
Nancy Whitten       3,756 53.29%
Kathy Richarson       3,278 46.51%
Position 4
Ramiro Valderrama       3,924 56.67%
Jim Wasnick       2,987 43.14%
Position 6
Jesse Bornfreund       2,125 31.74%
Tom Vance       4,546 67.90%
Election Night  Votes %
Position 2
Nancy Whitten       3,228 53.55%
Kathy Richarson       2,787 46.23%
Position 4
Ramiro Valderrama       3,345 56.47%
Jim Wasnick       2,566 43.32%
Position 6
Jesse Bornfreund       1,833 31.96%
Tom Vance       3,883 67.70%

Day 2 of the Election Results

Here is the latest from King County:

Wed, Nov 9
Votes %
Position 2
Nancy Whitten       3,756 53.29%
Kathy Richarson       3,278 46.51%
Position 4
Ramiro Valderrama       3,924 56.67%
Jim Wasnick       2,987 43.14%
Position 6
Jesse Bornfreund       2,125 31.74%
Tom Vance       4,546 67.90%
Election Night  Votes  %
Position 2
Nancy Whitten       3,228 53.55%
Kathy Richarson       2,787 46.23%
Position 4
Ramiro Valderrama       3,345 56.47%
Jim Wasnick       2,566 43.32%
Position 6
Jesse Bornfreund       1,833 31.96%
Tom Vance       3,883 67.70%

As you can see, there was little change in the percentages. I have declared Whitten, Valderrama and Vance the winners for reasons noted in the previous post.