Vote No on 1125

Initiative 1125 is masquerading as a tolling bill.  In reality, it would devastate funding for our major roads projects such as SR 520, the viaduct, the Columbia River Crossing and SR 167.  The Office of Financial Management estimates that the state would lose over $60m in federal matching monies if this initiative passes.

Twenty-five percent of the funding for 520 comes from tolls.  Because the Initiative provides that the politicians in Olympia will set the tolls rather than an independent commission of traffic experts, our State Treasurer’s independent analysis shows that the cost of interest on the bonds might increase by $18m per $100m of principal if they could be sold at all.  How many investors do you know would buy bonds whose payback is dependent on decisions by politicians?

Further, after the initial bonds are paid, the tolls would come off and we would be back competing for gas tax funds with other projects around the state.  Gas tax funds are currently stretched to the limit and many rural roads will turn into gravel roads due to the lack of funds.  Removal of the tolls will only accelerate the deterioration.

Secondly, there is a little clause slipped into the end of the initiative that would bar Sound Transit from putting light rail on the I-90.  Voters and the communities around I-90 support light rail but one Bellevue wealthy developer is opposed to this project.  He is the primary funder of this initiative.

There is an incredibly broad coalition supporting No On 1125.  Businesses, chambers of commerce across the state, newspapers, environmental, non-profit and neighborhood groups have come together to say No to 1125, including one of Bellevue’s key business groups.

A “No” vote on 1125 is the preferred vote.

Vance fails to answer issues questionnaire

Tom Vance, a candidate for City Council Position 6, failed to respond to the questionnaire I sent following the August primary.

The questionnaire (below the jump) is comprehensive–much more so than that of the Sammamish Review– and would provide voters will a better understanding of his position on issues of importance.

Throughout the campaign, Vance has not door-belled though he has attended candidate forums. His view has been that he didn’t need to campaign since he was running against an unknown and he had name recognition.

See the issues questionnaire below.

Continue reading

Bornfreund fails to answer issues questionnaire

Jesse Bornfreund, a candidate for City Council Position 6, failed to respond to the questionnaire I sent following the August primary.

The questionnaire (below the jump) is comprehensive–much more so than that of the Sammamish Review– and would provide voters will a better understanding of his position on issues of importance.

Throughout the campaign, Bornfreund largely confined his campaigning to advertisements, being a regular at the Farmer’s Market, attending candidate forums and for the most part has done very little door-belling.

Bornfreund has aligned himself as essentially a co-candidate with Jim Wasnick rather than taking an independent approach to the campaign. Wasnick is closely aligned with John Galvin, whose history has been well documented in this forum.

See the issues questionnaire below.

Continue reading

Wasnick fails to answer issues questionnaire

Jim Wasnick, a candidate for City Council Position 4, failed to respond to the questionnaire I sent following the August primary.

The questionnaire (below the jump) is comprehensive–much more so than that of the Sammamish Review– and would provide voters will a better understanding of his position on issues of importance.

Throughout the campaign, Wasnick has largely limited his issues statements to advertisements and an occasional candidate meeting. As far as I know, he has not door-belled to meet voters. He was a regular at the Farmer’s Market.

Wasnick and his supporters have largely focused on negative campaigning against his opponent, Ramiro Valderrama, rather than concentrating on the issues. Wasnick is closely aligned with John Galvin, whose history has been well documented in this forum.

See the issues questionnaire below.

Continue reading

Valderrama answers issues questionnaire

General Information

Name: Ramiro Valderrama

1. City Council Position Sought:  Sammamish City Council Position 4

2. Neighborhood you live in: Sammamish Glen

3. General area you live in: (e.g., SE 20th St. and 212th Ave. SE.)

4. Current or Previous positions in city government (and dates). None

5. Current or Previous positions in community organizations (and dates):

Spokesman for Citizens for Sammamish ,  US Services Academy Selection Board for 8th Congressional District

Your Campaign

6. Why are you running for election (or re-election)?

I love Sammamish and want to bring my talents and experience to making it a better place. I also want a City Council that:

  • Is more considerate and responsive to the concerns and needs of the entire community;
  • Leverages the extraordinary knowledge, diversity and talents of our citizens
  • Prioritizes spending and uses our tax dollars wisely, sparingly, and effectively. Continue reading