Ritchie accuses the council majority of denying a debate on plastic bags ban; Malchow denies

Miki Mullor
Editor

  • Ritchie and Ross trade heated text messages
  • The legislative committee failed to get the required three votes for a proclamation
  • Discussion on the plastic bag ban postponed

The dysfunction of Sammamish City Council reached new levels over a proclamation in support of Senate Bill 5323 that calls for a state-wide plastic bag ban and a 5 cents tax for paper bags.

Plastic bag ban: a long-time controversial issue
Jason Ritchie
Jason Ritchie

The plastic bag ban has come before the previous city council on March 7, 2017.  Several citizens voiced a different position on the bans, including the Sammamish Chamber of Commerce that supported the ban but opposed a tax on paper bags.

Then-Mayor Don Gerend directed the City Manager to schedule a study session and encouraged both pro and con groups to provide the city scientific evidence. The study session has not been scheduled and it has been sitting on the council’s long term calendar since.

Council Member Jason Ritchie is a supporter of the plastic bag ban and of SB 5323.  His Facebook page shows several instances of paid posts supporting banning plastic bags. In December, Ritchie announced his plans to introduce a Sammamish plastic bag ban ordinance.

Procedural error?

During the March 20 legislative committee meeting, Ritchie proposed that the full council discuss a proclamation in support of SB 5323.  Council rules specify that adding an item to the preliminary agenda can be done by the support of three council members–which Ritchie did not have.

Nevertheless, the draft proclamation ended up on the April 2 council meeting’s agenda – not as a formal agenda bill but as an item related to Council Member Ramiro Valderrama’s report on the legislative committee meeting, circumventing council rules.

From City Council April 2 agenda

When the meeting got to the Draft Proclamation on SB 5323, Council Member Tom Hornish moved to table (postpone) any discussion to a later time.  The council voted 4-3 in favor. Hornish’s motion was premature given that the Draft Proclamation was not a formal agenda item and Ritchie has not yet moved to propose it.

The council erupted in a long discussion on proper procedure, including the real-time reading of council rules, consulting with the City Attorney and City Manager about the proper procedure,  and on a new motion by Ritchie to consider his proclamation as part of the agenda. The new motion appeared that it could have remedied the procedure breakdown. However, Ritchie withdrew it before the council had a chance to vote on it. Ritchie then moved to have the proclamation be discussed in a study session but no one seconded.

Ritchie accuses fellow council members; Malchow responds

Later that night, in an unpreceded move by a Sammamish Council Member, Ritchie posted the following message on his Facebook page and paid Facebook to promote it as an ad:

In response to Ritchie, Mayor Christie Malchow posted her own Facebook post, countering Ritchie’s:

“After that meeting it has been stated that 4 members attempted to stifle discussion, but that is not accurate as the topic was tabled (which means it will be discussed later) and it was tabled due to what most of us viewed as procedural error.

The issue wasn’t raised at the time it was moved to table, rather that came later & then ultimately the motion to discuss it was withdrawn 𝒂𝒇𝒕𝒆𝒓 I turned the decision over 𝕥𝕠 𝕥𝕙𝕖 𝕓𝕠𝕕𝕪 𝕥𝕠 𝕕𝕖𝕔𝕚𝕕𝕖 on whether or not we should allow the topic to come forward

Again, the 𝒎𝒐𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝒕𝒐 𝒅𝒊𝒔𝒄𝒖𝒔𝒔 𝒘𝒂𝒔 𝒘𝒊𝒕𝒉𝒅𝒓𝒂𝒘𝒏 by the Councilmember that made it, so there wasn’t the opportunity to debate any subject matter.

Mayor Christie Malchow

In a written statement to the Comment, Ritchie disputed Malchow’s recollection of the events:

“I made a tabling motion at the end to bring back CM Ross’s motion on political speech and my plastic bag discussion to a later meeting, specifically our next study session, attempting to follow the Roberts Rules.”

Council Member Jason Ritchie

Ritchie’s version-disputed motion can be seen here: https://youtu.be/sRpCcKf0TLs?t=3460

Ritchie’s withdrawal of his motion can be seen here: https://youtu.be/sRpCcKf0TLs?t=4272

Name calling and threats over text messages

A public records request filed by The Sammamish Comment reveals angry text messages the following morning between Ritchie and Council Member Chris Ross over Ritchie’s Facebook post:

When reached for comments, Ritchie pointed a finger at Ross, saying that “during our last meeting, espoused virulent and personally offensive views of myself and CM Stuart. He crossed a line and we are owed a personal apology”.

Both sides did not want a debate

The Comment obtained the audio recording of the March 20 Legislative Committee meeting, attended by Valderrama, Pam Stuart, and Ritchie. The recording reveals that indeed Ritchie sought support from the entire council to add his proclamation to the formal agenda – but didn’t receive such support, with the exception of Stuart.

Legislative Committee Meeting – March 20
Ramiro Valderrama

Valderrama warned the others that the issue is controversial and reminded the committee of past discussions, where Sammamish citizens, some who claim to be experts on the subject, offered different opinions.  

One of those citizens is Todd Myers, who is the Environmental Director of the Washington Policy Center. Myers opposes the plastic bag ban.

While Ritchie supported scheduling a study session, he opposed having Myers participate:

“I agree. Let’s have a conversation. Let’s bring in preferably not people partisans like Todd Myers. I don’t think that’s the right person, but I do think there are reasonable people on both sides that can see an issue and discuss it.“

Ritchie also insisted that the vote on the proclamation moves forward immediately before a study session – even though it was clear it has no chance to pass.

“Ramiro, I support the idea [of a study session], but I’m gonna press a little bit harder on the proclamation. I’d like to bring him to the floor before we get to the idea of a study session.”

Council Member Pam Stuart

Stuart voiced disdain to a study session on the subject: “if you can send me one article that says plastic is good for the environment than I’ll entertain [a study session].”

In the end, the three voted unanimously to recommend a study session on the subject and voted 2-1 to bring a draft proclamation to the council, with Valderrama dissenting.

In response to the Comment’s question on why insisting on bringing to a vote an issue that clearly didn’t have the support of even three council members, Ritchie told the Comment that he believed Malchow would be supportive of the plastic bag ban, to the extent that she placed the issue on the long term agenda’s “parking lot”.

Further reading: the full text of Ritchie’s comments to this article.

Get real time updates to your email when news are posted. Your email will not be shared with third parties

Join 1,111 other followers


17 thoughts on “Ritchie accuses the council majority of denying a debate on plastic bags ban; Malchow denies”

  1. There is no reason to duck an issue.
    Your opinion should be a matter of record, for or against, I may not agree with you on a particular issue, but I have respect for your opinion.
    Stand up and be counted.

  2. Great piece, thanks for doing the legwork here. Those text messages are eye openers for sure.

    I watched this council meeting live. It was a complete disaster. This is clearly a divisive issue – personally I am against the bag ban but I am sure others are in favor. But why even bring this up when the council could be discussing more important items that they have broad agreement on?

    Why hasn’t there been a study session on the ransomware attack?

    Why hasn’t there been any discussion on getting EFR service restored at station 81?

    What is the situation vis a vis the budget? How close are we to running out of money and needing to raise taxes?

    These are three issues that are unquestionably more important than any proclamation about any topic. They are being completely ignored by the council. Instead, they bring up useless political nonsense and try to needle each other.

    My question to every Sammamish councilmember: why are you putting personal vendettas against the other side above the duty you have to serve the people? Why is every council meeting dominated by childish bickering?

    Does Sammamish have provisions in its code for recall elections?

    1. Thank you for redirecting toward a few of the actual, critical issues that need attention and require updates for the public.

  3. Since I am mentioned by Councilman Ritchie and in the article, I’ll just make two points:
    1) Although the councilman writes me off as a “partisan,” I have worked in environmental policy for two decades and have served on the Puget Sound Salmon Recovery Council for the last several years. In fact, I have a piece today in Seattle Times that I wrote with the head of the Nisqually Tribe’s salmon recovery efforts: https://www.seattletimes.com/…/with-billions-more-in…/
    2) The studies on plastic bags are from the U.K. and Danish governments (among others). I’m not sure how their research is partisan or why it would be dismissed unless they are politically inconvenient to the councilman.

  4. What’s clear is that Ritchie does not take defeat or being challenged well, going so far as to denigrate and attempt to bully constituents and his electorate.
    What is not clear is how he got elected in the first place.
    He may need help before he hurts someone.

  5. The casually-texted comment, “Grow a pair,” speaks volumes to how this misogynist views women — both in his constituency as well as his “council mates.”

    He’s totally unfit for any public office, but that only makes him a member of a very big club.

  6. How could he say “grow a pair”? That’s so sexist. That speaks volumes in how he feels about a female mayor who doesn’t have “a pair.” This is just awful! Where’s the public outcry in how genitalia is being referenced in Richie’s sexist, mysogenistic text.

  7. You should know the context of these remarks is being ignored. CM Ross made a series sexist and racist remarks to me in an open meeting and afterward in another meeting. I had heard enough. I demanded he apologize, he refused. I demanded he stop, he refused. I will not sit by when this happens. I will confront it. The comments he made about CM Stuart, myself and minorities in our community were completely inappropriate.

    1. Even if Ross made the statements Ritchie alleges, which knowing Ross, I doubt, this does not excuse Ritchie’s obscene and overt racial remarks in his texts. Ritchie would be better off taking the high ground—but he didn’t now and he doesn’t as a matter of personality.

      The text messages from Ritchie to Ross expose in vivid detail the mean-spirited personality he hides behind an affable exterior. This is something I’ve seen for more than a year, having read emails and other communiques from Jason.

      If you read his full responses to Sammamish Comment’s questions, you will see that Ritchie only casts blame toward others and accepts no responsibility for his own actions. He doubles down on everything and sees nothing wrong with his obscene and insulting texts to Chris Ross.

      When I was editor of The Comment and first interviewed Ritchie in Feb 2017, it was clear he was uninformed and naïve about the political realities of the Growth Management Act and the State Legislature. This was surprising given the fact he had just run for the State Legislature (narrowly losing to Jay Rodne), and before that, for US Congress, a race he also lost. He should have had a good grasp of the issues. He did not.

      In the only candidates forum for his position, Ritchie fell back not on well researched positions, but empty, feel-good platitudes.

      During his first year on the council, Ritchie was amazingly incurious. He proved to be a light weight empty suit with a hidden mean spirit.

      His second year has been marked by invective with his fellow council members such as demonstrated by his text messages. The dysfunction of the council is due in no small part to Ritchie’s actions (though in fairness, he’s hardly alone). In the meantime, the peoples’ business suffers.

    2. It is interesting that Jason claims to defend women and minorities, but he can’t seem to get along with the women and minorities on the council.

    3. We’re waiting for you non-apology, Jason. You know, the classic politician’s “I’m sorry if my remarks offended anybody.” Apparently your testosterone level precludes even that.

    4. What a hypocritical extremist response. YOU did wrong and your response is to cry “sexism” and “racism”. Taking cues from the extremist identitarian left to spin your shame is inexcusable. A non-apology would have been expected, but your “attack apology” is a complete embarrassment. Ritchie, your ridiculous attitude shows what a complete fool you really are. You will NEVER get my vote.

  8. Jason, I am shocked and offended to the core on your fabricated statements above. Further, I have never been asked to apologize for anything and recall all of our meetings as amicable. I want to move on and focus on working together in our council roles. The slander and untruths above however have to stop. Let’s focus on the people’s business and it is ok if we disagree.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s