Sammamish’s war on dogs

Update, May 8, 11am: I received an email from Jessie Bon, who says the Sammamish Review not only misquoted her on the issue of dogs “relieving” themselves in the water–she says she didn’t say anything of the kind:

I believe I was misquoted in the Sammamish Review. To my knowledge (and I’ve watched the tape), I did not make a comment about dogs relieving themselves in the water. In fact, nothing of that nature was said at the council meeting based on my review of the tape this afternoon.

If, indeed, the Review did misconstrue what Bon said or didn’t say, this doesn’t negate the larger issue, and that is the City of Sammamish is engaged in unnecessary action to restrict parks from dogs. Big Rock Park’s North Meadow makes a great run/play area and Evans Creek Park has acres and acres of meadow for which no use whatsoever is undertaken.

Update, May 8, 12n: I’ve now received an email from Ari Cetron retracting the dogs relieve themselves portion of his story. Cetron writes:

She was generally right about the water. I actually just reviewed the tape myself. She didn’t say the dogs relieve themselves in the water, she said there would be “sanitation issues” with dogs on ballfields and kids then playing the the field. I conflated the two situations and have corrected it online.

Original Post:

The City of Sammamish continues its war on dogs.

This week’s Sammamish Review has this article that proposes more regulations banning dogs from pretty much any public park and property. The Review writes:

The new regulations all but bans dogs from large parts of Sammamish parks. Four-legged friends, even on a leash, would no longer be permitted on athletic fields, in picnic shelters, or in water bodies and their associated beaches, docks and nearby marine areas.
[Parks director Jessi] Bon said she understands some dog owners like to take their pets to swim at city lakes, but noted that animals might relieve themselves in the water, causing potential health problems for people. She also noted some areas where dogs are currently allowed might also be taken off the list if the animals destroy vegetation.

Apparently Bon doesn’t own a dog, or so it seems. Dogs have very distinct postures when “relieving” themselves and after a lifetime of owning dogs, I’ve never seen one do so in the water. They splash, swim, wade and even run. People are more likely to “relieve” themselves than are dogs. The larger problem of urine and feces in the water comes from ducks, geese, fish and other wildlife.

Dogs are already restricted at all the city parks in some form or another. The exception, if you want to call it that, is the prison-like off-lease area at Beaver Lake Park, a very small area that can be walked around in five minutes. Big Rock Park and Evans Creek Park have large, open fields that are used for nothing that make great play areas to run and chase balls–but our City Council designates these entire parks as on-leash parks.

The vote was 5-1-1.

This is another nanny state effort on the part of the City Council.

Welcome to Sammamish, Klahanie.

4 thoughts on “Sammamish’s war on dogs

    • I agree, what a great article. By the way, Gail, I’m a Twelves, too, but live in El Paso, TX. Our dog problem is vastly different here on the border. Dogs are down on the Rio Grande doing every which thing. It was a fun article to read and shows the contrast of the far North and far South in regards to dog control.

  1. Right on.
    I am a cat person, but sympathize totally with author.
    If Bon’s concern is relieving in the waters then logically even humans should be banned from the pristine waters of the city parks with such facilities. Kids have been peeing in the water since the beginning of time. No apology for the blunt language.

  2. As a dog owner in Sammamish, I have a few comments to add.
    1. I agree people (especially children) are far more likely to relieve themselves in water than a dog, but unlike you, I’ve got 2 dogs & both have pooped in Lake Washington before…so it does happen.
    2. There are plans for Big Rock park (not that I agree with their plans for them), but none-the-less, there are plans. So the giant opens space is being considered for development (playground, and zip line potentially). I should comment here that I totally disagree with both those projects – with playgrounds at both Lower Commons & Ebright (both .5 miles from Big Rock, it’s overkill).
    3. I watched the Parks & Rec meeting where they updated the Council on the Big Rock park, Bon actually argued that they shouldn’t do an off-leash area at Big Rock because of the Wild Life; apparently that wasn’t a consideration at Beaver Lake. It’s preposterous we don’t have off-leash even on the consideration list for Big Rock.
    4. FYI – There’s no leash law in Sammamish (except in Parks), so go walk your dog off-leash….perfectly legal.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s